Under the Mountain Bunker

Leave me a message   Location: Colorado. More info here.



» Website

twitter.com/charyl:

    Mitt Romney isn’t qualified to run U.S. Foreign Policy →

    When conservatives want to put another version of George W. Bush in charge of U.S. foreign policy:


    (Video above) OFA: In a series of interviews, Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright,Senator John KerryAdmiral John Nathman (ret.), and Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy explain why Mitt Romney is not prepared to be commander-in-chief. They each lay out how President Obama’s leadership has made America stronger, safer and more secure while Mitt Romney has nothing to offer except bluster, chest-thumping, and a commitment to endless war. As Monday’s debate will demonstrate, blunder and bluster are no substitute for strong leadership.

    And this:

    Mitt Romney’s Neocon War Cabinet: “Romney is loath to mention Bush on the campaign trail, for obvious reasons, but today they sound like ideological soul mates on foreign policy. Listening to Romney, you’d never know that Bush left office bogged down by two unpopular wars that cost America dearly in blood and treasure. Of Romney’s forty identified foreign policy advisers, more than 70 percent worked for Bush. Many hail from the neoconservative wing of the party, were enthusiastic backers of the Iraq War and are proponents of a US or Israeli attack on Iran. Christopher Preble, a foreign policy expert at the Cato Institute, says, “Romney’s likely to be in the mold of George W. Bush when it comes to foreign policy if he were elected.”

    — 1 year ago with 1 note
    1. underthemountainbunker posted this